1	Remaking Human Rights User/Survivor Advocacy on the Disability Convention
2	"By Tina Minkowitz" By Tina Minkowitz Photos by Tom Olin
3	Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Negotiated in NY; “Ad Hoc Committee” of UN General Assembly Began in 2002 High degree of openness to NGO participation, mainly organized through International Disability Caucus of international, regional and national organizations of PWD and allied NGOs Leadership of DPOs, “Nothing about us without us”
4	Human Rights 8th core HR treaty in UN system Binding treaty supersedes previous international declarations on disability Treaty monitoring bodies Committees of experts OHCHR, Human Rights Council, Special Rapporteurs NGO participation
5	User/Survivor Participation Social model of disability as lens to focus non-discriminatory application of existing human rights World Network of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry (WNUSP) part of International Disability Alliance (IDA) Formed IDC, steering committee 2004 Working Group composed of 27 governments, 12 NGOs chosen by IDC, 1 NHRI
6	User/Survivor Participation International team: Hungary, Peru, Ghana, Guinea, Uganda, India, Denmark, Sweden, USA, Canada, New Zealand, Japan (attending AHC); more involved nationally and through Internet WNUSP, MF/SCI, People Who, Venture House, others NZ govt delegation
7	What did we accomplish? Established new norms in human rights Raised awareness of user/survivor human rights issues on global scale Educated government decision-makers and disability community User/survivor movement gained experience in human rights advocacy Human rights focus of new national and regional groups
8	New norms Legal capacity equal with others Passive rights and capacity to act Free and informed consent on equal basis with others Liberty without discrimination “in no case shall the existence of a disability justify a deprivation of liberty”
9	New norms Right to respect for integrity on an equal basis with others Relationship with torture and with free and informed consent Non-discrimination and equal protection Peer support and right to live in community
10	New norms Users and survivors of psychiatry covered by the Convention PWD “includes” those with long term mental impairment “mental” distinguished from “intellectual” Impossible to predict duration Psychiatric diagnosis as both environmental barrier and imputed disability
11	What it means Legal capacity + free and informed consent = no forced psychiatry Liberty should be read in context as non-discrimination, no separate standards or procedures are permitted for PWD such as “danger to self or others”
12	Opportunity to change MH From restrictive to enabling Not euphemism but actual equality of rights Repeal coercion-based MH laws and replace with laws on right to supportive services Opportunity for programmatic development and policy support for the kinds of services that people want Ensure that MH policy is treated as “disability” matter obligating DPO consultation
13	What it means Need for further advocacy to ensure forced psychiatry is dealt with as torture Criminalized Grave human rights violation, victims and survivors entitled to reparations Not only individual compensation but assurance of non-repetition, honoring memory, restoring previously held status and rights
14	What it means Need to ensure that “long term” does not limit coverage Is imputed disability “long term” if it affects our lives significantly? Reject medical model implications of addressing disability primarily in terms of “long term” impairment Important area for advocacy since it emerged late in negotiations process
15	More on Legal Capacity Article as a whole: Legal personality - recognition of personhood Legal capacity - capacity to act Access to support to exercise capacity Safeguards on measures related to exercise of capacity Prevent abuse Respect the rights, will and preferences of the person Subject to regular review, proportional to degree to which measures affect rights and interests International human rights law Financial rights
16	Paradigm shift Equal legal capacity - not only presumption Every human being has a will and can express it Poor judgment, lack of insight, perceived deficiencies in capability are irrelevant Need for support is interactive, not objective determination
17	Capacity to act - Implications “legal capacity on an equal basis with others in all aspects of life” Repeal/reform of guardianship laws Guardianship cannot be imposed against a person’s will Guardianship transformed into support relationship with fiduciary obligations but no coercive effect No restriction permissible - partnership not substitution Legal independence of persons
18	Capacity to act - Implications Repeal/ reform mental health laws Repeal all laws permitting and regulating coercive measures in MH Consider whether advisable from strategic or policy point of view to create positive obligations to provide wanted services Is there a role for mental health laws without coercion?
19	Interaction with other norms Mental health laws based on incapacity as well as quasi-criminal “dangerousness” and “public health” standards Neither of them valid under Convention “Dangerousness” falls to non-discrimination “Public health” justification for MH coercion amounts to systemic discrimination regarding free and informed consent based on biological classification of human beings according to their behavior, and use of behavior control methods that violate prohibition against torture
20	Capacity to act - Implications Contract law: what is fair play in disability context? Civil rights: right to vote, right to marry Need analysis of legal framework to determine other implications
21	Capacity to act - Implications Equal responsibilities: abolish insanity defense Mental element of crime all that is needed to ensure fairness in assigning criminal responsibility Disability may be relevant as a circumstance mitigating the seriousness of the crime Reasonable accommodation required in all aspects of arrest, trial and detention Should not impose punishment that is disproportionately harsh because of interaction with disability
22	Safeguards “Measures related to the exercise” Read together with other provisions, this must refer to support and not to restrictive measures With equal legal capacity, and the obligation to respect the rights, will and preferences of the person, support cannot be imposed against a person’s will Safeguards should be understood to refer to wide range of support, and tailored appropriately - need to ensure that PWD using support are not over-protected compared with non-PWD using similar support.
23	Safeguards “in accordance with international human rights law” Refer to treaties and not to disputed declarations that purport to set lower standards for legal capacity of PWD CEDAW guarantees equal legal capacity to women (including women with disabilities) All relevant provisions, including those in this Convention, addressing prevention of abuse and exploitation and complementing the provision of support.
24	More on Legal Capacity Financial matters “subject to the provisions of this article” Read as reinforcing the obligation to provide access to support people may need to exercise legal capacity
25	More on Liberty PWD cannot be deprived of liberty unless it is under disability-neutral standards and procedures If deprived of liberty, entitled to same guarantees as others under international human rights law, plus reasonable accommodation
26	More on Liberty Non-discrimination analysis caveat: distinctions that are reasonable and objective, to achieve purposes that are legitimate under human rights law (including Disability Convention) are not discrimination Psychiatric standards do not fit these criteria Not objective Not for legitimate purposes (violate principles and rights guaranteed in this Convention) Not reasonable (disability profiling; collective punishment)
27	More on Integrity “physical and mental integrity of the person” Obligation underlying prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment Independently guaranteed in regional HR conventions Does it help to get rid of forced psychiatry or establish that it is violence?
28	More on Integrity “Forced interventions aimed at correcting, improving or alleviating any actual or perceived impairment” Not in text, but concept may be useful Disability dimension - intolerance of different ways of being human Autonomy and choice in matters relating to one’s own disability
29	More on Integrity Relationship with free and informed consent Not only about force, but also requires accurate information to make a decision Civil/ political right, not subject to limitation As part of the right to health, free and informed consent was thought to be subject to limitations (through general limitations clause in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), but this is inappropriate since consent is an individual freedom related to important value of physical/mental integrity.
30	More on Integrity What does it cover? Different contexts in each regional treaty and in national legislations Universally applicable interpretation is as obligation underlying International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 7 (torture and CIDT) Broad construction of Article 7, for example to prohibit corporal punishment as disciplinary or educational measure Can be usable now to reinforce right to free and informed consent, and begin to address medical intervention over objection as violence
31	Other Important Features Non-discrimination generally and with respect to work and adequate standard of living Denial of reasonable accommodation is discrimination Right to live in community with choices equal to others; peer support Right to vote and stand for election Intersecting discrimination Gender Recognition of cultural identities
32	Other Important Features Children Evolving capacities, same rights as other children to express views and have their views be given due weight in decisions about themselves Note early identification and intervention “as appropriate” Right to education not to be deprived on the basis of disability, individualized support measures and reasonable accommodation Requiring children to be drugged as condition of admission to school would violate this provision
33	Implementation and Monitoring “Close consultation” and “active involvement of” DPOs in legislation and policies to implement convention or otherwise relating to pwd National monitoring by NHRI or equivalent - DPO involvement required
34	Implementation and Monitoring Committee of experts (TMB) “participation of experts with disabilities” Standard features including state reporting; individual and group complaints and inquiry procedures in optional protocol Invites consultation with DPOs in nomination of experts and preparation of state reports Committee may consult DPOs (included in “other competent bodies”) on areas falling within their mandates, and transmit to them requests for technical assistance
35	Implementation and Monitoring International cooperation obligations Inclusive development programs Capacity building and best practices Partnership with DPOs Caution: “cooperation in research and scientific and technical knowledge” Conference of States Parties Mechanism to share information; in similar processes NGO participation is assured
36	U.S. and the Convention U.S. says it will not sign or ratify Disability community has not shown great interest, but could be mobilized Highly developed u/s movement here Convention could give us the tools to win the long-standing battles against coercion and for u/s-controlled and wanted services
37	U.S. and the Convention What can be done: Begin to use Convention as framework for policy advocacy Work with local governments to accept Convention as relevant norm Work with other disability organizations for awareness-raising and ratification
38	U.S. and the Convention Additional areas for HR advocacy: Build awareness of disability in other HR mechanisms U.S. is party to ICCPR, CAT and CERD CERD report due in 2007 Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
39	Envisioning the Future Convention belongs to all of us Needs collaborative study in grassroots groups to identify all its potential International cooperation among u/s organizations, with other DPOs, governments, development organizations User-survivor run collaborative centers to develop comprehensive implementation models
40	Envisioning the Future Awareness raising: media, cultural materials Mad pride Human rights allies Building the movement with victories
41	Nothing About Us Without Us More resources: www.wnusp.org www.un.org/socdev/enable www.un.org/socdev/enable/rights/adhoccom.html www.icrpd.net/en/toolkit/index.html