Welcome to BackTalk, where our readers have an opportunity to discuss
the news of the day. Please keep it civil and treat each other with respect.
Readers can report individual posts as offensive by clicking on the ! symbol
at the end of each one. Comments that are offensive, contain personal
insults, profanity or are off topic are subject to being deleted.
12 comments from other readers:
1. T.K. - Daytona
This is precisely why we need universal
healthcare coverage in this country!!! Big Pharma, Big Insurance and
Big Biomedical Engineering are FOR PROFIT, not FOR PATIENT!!! This
article tells the story of the ills and evils of the pharmaceutical
giants. These huge multi-national conglomerates spend Billions on
research and development. Consequently , they spend even more Billions
on marketing these products and cultivating a skilled sales force to
AGGRESSIVELY PUSH THESE PRODUCTS. The salespeople go to GREAT LENGTHS
to market these drugs DIRECTLY to doctors, and even to the end users.
These doctors are given everything from gifts, vacations, lunches and
dinners and even CASH KICKBACKS!!!! The drug companies use doctors who
regularly prescribe their products, as consultants to brief and market
the clinical applications to other doctors. This is done in exchange
for a spot on the payroll of the drug companies. THIS IS AN EGREGIOUS
AND BLATANT ETHICAL VIOLATION THAT IS COMMONPLACE IN MEDICINE. It's not
ethical to promote drugs in exchange for kickbacks. This is also
detrimental to us, the patients of the following doctors. We tend to
get prescribed the drugs of the "kickback" companies in exponentially
greater proportions than other drugs, thus denying us necessary
therapeutics. Often times, like in the article above we are prescribed
drugs EVEN IF WE DON'T NEED THEM OR GAIN ANY BENEFIT IN TAKING THEM!!!
The Pharmaceutical companies reward doctors for maintaining a SALES
QUOTA!!! If they sell "X" amount of drug "y", they hit an OUTRAGEOUS
BONUS. The point here is, WHENEVER THE INFLUENCE OF MONEY PLAYS A ROLE
IN MEDICINE, CLINICAL WELLBEING IS SACRIFICED IN EXCHANGE FOR THE "ALL
MIGHTY DOLLAR". And the argument that MONEY is what drives research and
development to some extent is true. Alternatively true is the fact that
European and Asian Pharmaceutical companies develop drug technologies
on the same scale as we do here in the states. The truth is, many
companies listed in the article are European. (Merck, Pfizer, etc.) The
fact that we operate under the Capitalistic model of healthcare
administration, our drug rates are DRAMATICALLY INFLATED due to our
demand driven market and unregulated pricing schedules. You can thank
the Pharmaceutical lobby for that. Socialist healthcare administrations
of Europe and Latin America regulate their drug prices and mandate
affordable prescriptions, IT'S THAT SIMPLE!!! These are the exact same
companies that exist, manufacture and sell here in the U.S. Why does a
double-standard exist between the United States and the other countries
of the world when it comes to the Pharmaceutical industry???? The
Pharmacy lobby is a Trillion dollar industry with an INCREDIBLE PROFIT
MARGIN. (pills are cheap to make) They've colluded with the Insurance
industry, as well as the Biomedical Implant industry to FLEECE THE
AMERICAN PUBLIC UNDER THE GUISE OF SUPREME HEALTHCARE!!! Our
Congressmen and Senators are bought and paid for by these industries so
they are powerless to reform these industries. We need to stand up and
take control of our lives- it's a matter of life and death. VOTE
DEMOCRATIC IN 2008. 1ST- Edwards, 2nd- Clinton, 3rd- Obama!!!! 1/10/2008 3:23:00 AM
2. bubba - fla
For the 1st time EVER I agree w/ TK! On
everything except the last lines. Voting democrat won't be any better
than republican. They are just as corrupt. Even with someone as
idealistic as Barack or Edwards if they were elected it would only be a
matter of time before they were bought by the lobbyists. I totally
agree we need to stand up and take control but voting the same old way
- democrat /republican - is going to give the same old results.
Solutions? Maybe one huge purge of the existing politicians & start
over? I don't know - all I know is that what we have does not seem to
be working. 1/10/2008 7:27:00 AM
3. maria - daytona
Drugs makers are SO powerful, it's scary! They
bribe doctors, studies are biais....they are killing us. I'm still
amaze that Merck got sued with Vioxx (it was nice seeing their stocks
go down 30% in one day) :)
Hopefully a new era will come and some scientists will say NO to bribes
and only want what's good for humanity.
1/10/2008 7:31:00 AM
4. Amy - Daytona
This is disgusting. Antipsychotics for ADHD?! The
solution for active kids is to knock them on their butts and make them
unconscious? Somebody should go to jail for this. 1/10/2008 8:31:00 AM
5. Fathom - Deland
Compassion, understanding and hugs at the right
time make for great mood stabilizers; respect, civility, and comity is
a healing remedy for intermittent explosive disorder in most cases. My
son is the square peg that the public school system is trying to
squeeze into a round hole so to speak. Even in early childhood
educational programs it became apparent my child was unique in ways
that challeged standard educational practices. We tryed Methalphenidate
for three months. A request for the literature that the drug company
provides, not what the pharmacy provides, I discovered that it was not
for long term use. Results were not effective enogh to warrant further
use in my opinion. Children are human beings. Each child is unique. Let
their creative energy flow. 1/10/2008 9:06:00 AM
6. Citizen S - PC
OMG, I'm agreeing with TK.....
1/10/2008 9:10:00 AM
7. Dr. Lauren Kolman - North Miami
How any one who calls himself a doctor could say
that age is not a factor in determining appropriateness of any drug
does not understand anything about pharmacology or biochemistry. these
drugs are primarily tested on adults who can weigh upwards of 200
pounds or more than small children, and primarily males to rule out
hormonal variances. additionally, drugs are tested based on a diagnosis
which is based on certain criteria identified by the dsm lV revised
edition (i dont even know if there is a dsm V as of yet). some of the
diagnosing has to do with a certain length of premorbid period, meaning
life time prior to first incident. children are not even old enough to
satisfy any of the premorbid periods for almost all of the psychosis
based diagnoses. additionally, the testing that is done to generate a
diagnosis can not even be performed on a young child due to lack of
language skill development and cognitive development. aggression is not
psychosis. now, let's take a more logical, less academic, less
intellectual view of this. on the back of the baby aspirin or any over
the counter drug for children is a recommended dosage based on baby or
child's weight. how much more so important must this really be for a
drug that alters a child's brain chemistry? How these questions are not
dealt with boggles my mind. these children are stuffed with medication
to control them, not to resolve behavior, cognitive, or emotional
problems, or acting out as a response to some form of abuse.
unfortunately, due to the time consuming and cost ineffective nature of
dealing with such issues in a more practical paradigm, the multitude of
children in need can not be treated any other way by the state. this is
just a clear demonstration of the lack of value we, in general, have
for our country's children and poor. Lauren Kolman M.S.ED., .D.C.,
C.AD.
Chiropractic Physician
Board Certified Addicitonologist 1/10/2008 9:18:00 AM
8. Dizzy - PO
Here's a prescription for them all - a good old
fashioned spanking and some tough love! Let's not forget that the
parents are responsible for being too lazy to discipline. 1/10/2008 9:19:00 AM
9. T.K. - Daytona
So Dr. Kolman, in your estimation what would be
the motivating factor behind Pediatricians or Child Psychiatrists
prescribing these psychosis drugs? My explanation for this violation is
increased pressure from the Pharm. Reps/Companies to suggest and
prescribe these sometimes unneeded drugs. What's your take? 1/10/2008 9:41:00 AM
10. Wil Seabrook - Tampa, Florida
At what point, in this age of absolute
information overload, does news this disturbing cut through the white
noise and really get people's attention? The most profitable industry
in the world is experimenting with mind-altering drugs on children who
lack the power to defend their own self-determinism. The vast majority
of school shootings, most committed by young people, were done by kids
either on these drugs or coming off of them. We are mind-boggingly
close to 1930s Germany to the degree that powerful special interests
with a particular agenda are pulling the wool over the public's eyes,
with power and profit being the sole motivator. This is NOT about the
greater good, this is NOT about the health and sanity of the next
generation. This is about profit at whatever cost. At what point do we
turn off the computer, put down the blackberry and actually take a look
at the people around us and take RESPONSIBILITY for everyone around us?
No man is an island. The attitude that this somehow effects everyone
but "me" is to play the fiddle while Rome burns. Will it take a
generation of zombies to wake us up? And will the culture by that time
be too far gone to salvage? I wish these questions were purely
hypothetical... 1/10/2008 9:58:00 AM
11. Jim - USA
Big Pharma is destroying the lives of children
and thereby destroying families and subsequently creating a bleak
future for too many of our society. Their power is ill-gotten. They are
undeserving. Their actions depicted are criminal. 1/10/2008 10:03:00 AM
12. EGH - Texas
The wholesale drugging of the youngest generation
is a nauseating symptom of how deficient our culture has become in the
know-how to deal with children and the will to invest the time and
attention necessary to do so. That's bad enough. But to use powerful
mind-altering substances intended for psychotics on children to "get
them under control" is beneath contempt. 1/10/2008 10:09:00 AM