July 21, 2005
Correction is More Good Mental Health News
Florida legislature passes protection from mental
health coercion
Our need to make the following correction is
wonderful news for parental rights in Florida and adds impetus to the
growing national backlash against government mandated mental health
screening and drugging of children. In our
July 18th update,
we stated that Florida Governor Jeb Bush had vetoed a bill prohibiting
school led mental health drugging and screening coercion and criticized that
veto.
It is true that Governor Bush did veto one bill
that:
- Prohibited the refusal of school entry or educational services if
parents refused psychotropic drugs for their children;
Allowed parents to refuse a mental
health screening;
Allowed parents to refuse a psychiatric
label in their child's records;
Prohibited school personnel from making
a referral for diagnosis or treatment of any diagnosis in psychiatry's
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual without full disclosure;
And required that the full disclosure
include "the fact that there is no medical test for a [psychological]
disorder, that the behaviors could be the result of underlying physical
conditions, and that the parent should consult a medical doctor to rule
out medical causes."
However, we have found out that
he did sign a second much larger and more
complicated bill dealing mostly with procedures for the provision of
psychotropic drugs to children in the welfare and foster care systems. That
bill also contains the following
very good language that protects
parental rights:
- Administration of psychotropic medication; prohibition; conditions.-
- 1) As used in this section, the term
"psychotropic medication" means a prescription medication that is used
for the treatment of mental disorders and includes, without limitation,
antihypnotics, antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiety agents,
sedatives, psychomotor stimulants, and mood stabilizers.
- 2) A public school may not deny any student access to programs or
services because the parent of the student has refused to place the
student on psychotropic medication.
- 3) A public school teacher and school district personnel may share
school-based observations of a student's academic, functional, and
behavioral performance with the student's parent and offer program
options and other assistance that is available to the parent and the
student based on the observations. However, a public school teacher
and school district personnel may not compel or attempt to compel any
specific actions by the parent or require that a student take medication.
A parent may refuse psychological screening of the student. Any
medical decision made to address a student's needs is a matter between
the student, the student's parent, and a competent health care
professional chosen by the parent.
This new law brings to two the number of states to our knowledge that have
defended parental rights by enacting some kind of prohibition on mental
health screening. That this occurred in a state governed by the brother of
President Bush who convened the New Freedom Commission is highly
significant. We are hopeful that it signals some sort of change of heart
toward these dangerous plans.
Although there is no protection of parents from charges of various kinds of
child abuse or neglect for refusing mental health screening or drugging,
this language is an excellent start, and the Florida Legislature and
Governor Bush should be highly commended and thanked for enacting this
legislation. We apologize for not doing so in our previous alert.
EdWatch is entirely user-supported. The continuation of our research
and distribution work is entirely dependent upon individual contributors. If
you want to assure that our work continues,
click here. If you want
to subscribe or unsubscribe to this EdWatch e-mail service, mail to:
edwatch@lakes.com.
Put "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" in the SUBJECT of the message. Resources of
videos, books, and audiotapes are available on our
shopping cart.